
NEW
YORK, NY/PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund (LDF) welcomes the Supreme Court’s rejection of
attempts to expand the death penalty to crimes other than murder.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing the majority opinion, said the
Constitution bars the imposition of “the death penalty for the rape of a
child where the crime did not result...in death of victim.”
“We are pleased that the Supreme Court has recognized that the death
penalty is not an appropriate punishment for a crime that, while
terrible, does not result in the taking of a life. This decision affirms
the emerging national consensus against the expansion of capital
punishment and constitutes an acknowledgment that death sentences for
rape are all too often infected by arbitrary considerations such as
race,” said John Payton, LDF President and Director-Counsel.
LDF, which has long opposed the death penalty, along with the ACLU and
the ACLU of Louisiana, had filed a friend of the court brief in today’s
case, Kennedy v. Louisiana. In its brief to the Supreme Court, LDF noted
that race plays a decisive role in the administration of the death
penalty for rape.
Specifically, LDF pointed to the fact that between 1930 and 1972 -- the
40 years prior to the Supreme Court’s last decision on the
constitutionality of the death penalty for rape -- Louisiana,
Mississippi, Oklahoma, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of
Columbia executed 66 blacks and no whites for the crime of rape.
“The Constitution is clearly violated when African Americans face
execution for a crime that the majority of Americans believe to be
non-death-worthy,” said Christina Swarns, Director of LDF’s Criminal
Justice Project.
Today’s decision affirms this country’s longstanding opposition to the
death penalty for rape and is consistent with the growing concerns about
the appropriateness of the death penalty in general.
Attorneys
General announced that eleven states[1] have reached an agreement with
Anheuser-Busch that will result in the nationwide discontinuance of two
popular pre-mixed alcoholic energy drinks, Tilt and Bud Extra. As part
of the agreement, Anheuser-Busch will not produce any caffeinated
alcohol beverages in the future. Attorneys
General commend Anheuser-Busch for its decision and call on other
manufacturers to take similar steps to remove these potentially
dangerous beverages from the market.
Attorneys General from around the country are gravely concerned about
alcoholic energy drinks. These beverages taste and look like popular
non-alcoholic energy drinks. These amped-up-alcopops are popular with
young people who often form the wrong belief that the caffeine in the
drinks will counteract the intoxicating effects of the alcohol. These
beliefs are fueled by aggressive marketing campaigns that promise
endless nights of fun and enhanced abilities.
These marketing claims coupled with published research about the dangers
of these products led Attorneys General to initiate an investigation
into the content and marketing of Anheuser-Busch products Tilt and Bud
Extra. The investigations were launched pursuant to state consumer
protection and trade practice statutes and alleged, among other things,
that Anheuser-Busch made express and implied false or misleading
health-related statements about the energizing effects of Tilt and Bud
Extra.
While Anheuser-Busch denied claims made by the Attorneys General, it
cooperated with the investigation and promptly decided to reformulate
Tilt and Bud Extra without caffeine or other stimulants and to agree not
to produce any other caffeinated alcohol beverages in the future.
Attorneys General praised Anheuser-Busch for being a responsible
industry leader and for eliminating all caffeinated alcohol beverages
from their product list.
“Alcohol mixed with high amounts of caffeine is a recipe for disaster,
particularly in the hands of young people,” said Maine Attorney General
Steve Rowe, Chair of the National Association of Attorneys General Youth
Access to Alcohol Committee. “The caffeine gives drinkers the subjective
belief that they can function normally. This false belief results in the
potential for increased serious harm. This agreement is a monumental win
for our nation’s young people who are lured by marketing into believing
these products are safe.”
Attorneys General emphasized that young people aren’t drinking just one
or two of these alcoholic energy drinks – these products are intended to
be consumed several times throughout a night of partying and to be used
as a mixer for other alcoholic beverages. A recently published study by
Dr. Mary Claire O’Brien of Wake Forest University found that college
students who mix alcohol and energy drinks engage in increased heavy
episodic drinking and have twice as many episodes of weekly drunkenness.
College students who reported consuming alcohol mixed with energy drinks
also had significantly higher prevalence of alcohol-related
consequences, like sexual assault and injury.
“Binge drinking among our youth in this nation has reached epidemic
proportions. These new products that offer the allure of an all night
party perpetuate the problem,” said
Maryland Attorney General Douglas Gansler. “Instead of sending a message
about responsible consumption of alcohol, makers of these alcoholic
energy drinks are pushing over-consumption and our youth are being
harmed.”
“The stimulating effects of the caffeine in these products can mask
feelings of intoxication. Consumers feel alert, but make unsafe
decisions as a result of alcohol impairment,” Idaho Attorney General
Lawrence Wasden said. “Obviously, this creates a highly dangerous
situation. I appreciate Anheuser-Busch’s willingness to address our
concerns directly and be a responsible leader in its marketing efforts.”
LONDON,
England (AFP): A senior adviser to London mayor Boris Johnson has quit
after apparently suggesting that if Caribbean immigrants did not like
London they should go home.
James McGrath, a 34-year-old Australian who was appointed director of
political strategy after Johnson was elected mayor on May 1, made the
comments in an interview with an Internet journalist published on
Sunday.
He was responding to a suggestion that the election of Tory politician
Johnson, who was attacked for his attitudes towards minorities during
the election campaign, could lead to an exodus of Caribbean immigrants.
He was quoted as saying: “Well, let them go if they don’t like it here.”
In response, Johnson said his adviser had been quoted out of context but
the remarks made it impossible for him to continue.
“James is not a racist. I know that,” he said. “He shares my passionate
belief that racism is vile, repulsive and has no place in modern
Britain.
“But his response to a silly and hostile question... allowed doubts to
be raised about that commitment.”
He added: “We both agree that he could not stay on as my political
adviser without providing ammunition for those who wish to deliberately
misrepresent our clear and unambiguous opposition to any racist
tendencies.”
Former Labour mayor Ken Livingstone had highlighted comments by the
former journalist about black people during his unsuccessful attempt to
be re-elected.
Livingstone said that a man who had once referred to black people as
“piccaninnies” with “watermelon smiles” in a newspaper article was not
fit to run an ethnically-diverse city.
Johnson later apologized for the comments and said he had been taken out
of context.